Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Engineer Guy's avatar

Note screwed up wood pellet project in the UK. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68381160

Expand full comment
Merewyn Groom's avatar

Hi New Zealand Energy, I've generally enjoyed your analysis and found it insightful, but I fear you might not have this one quite right. I cannot find anything online that indicates Nature's Flame were seriously considering doing torrefied pellets - can you please provide a link to the statement you refer to?

Torrefied wood fuel is only just reaching commercial scale, with production in Thailand and recently beginning in Finland. As I understand it some energy input is required at startup, but once the process is running it is pretty much self supplying as the volatile gases that come off the wood are captured and burnt to provide the heat. This does depend a bit on ambient temperature etc. The feedstock used in Finland is very similar to our own radiata, and there is a firm looking to deploy the same tech here.

Will it work in NZ? That's yet to be seen, but indications from overseas suggest it can. Is it a good idea? That depends on overall lifecycle emissions and yes EROI. I tend to think even if the EROI isn't great, but we can avoid emissions from coal and keep our grid security maybe that's acceptable? Certainly something you would want to evaluate with all the facts to hand. No good blundering blindly into a new way to waste resource.

The Drax example certainly is a cautionary tale, but comparisons aren't especially useful given very different circumstances are at play here.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts